KAG Kag looks horrible in 1080p

I had a 720p monitor, kag was on 720p resolution, it looked normally, now i bought a 1080p monitor and it looks ugly in both 720p and 1080p, looks like if theres full of dots on the screen, does anyone know a resolution that works well with it?

 

try to not have it full screen maybe?

 

still blured D:
Small resolutions like 800x600 without fullscreen it looks good, but im not like playing on such screen size, :/

 

just keep changing the resolutions until you find a perfect one.

 

all the * resolutions looks fine and ones without * looks bad, so i guess the * means that it is a good resolution for your screen right? but the biggest one with * is 1280x1024 which is really small to the sides, as my screen is 1920x1080, but custom resolutions all get blured, does custom resolutions need a 'calculation' or smth like that to find a number that works? ,-,

 

Seems the aspect ration, which I don't know if you can change, of KAG is 4:3.
The largest resolution I can find for that aspect ratio, given your screen resolution, is 1440x1080... of which the height of the screen is the limiting factor.

Found with:
"last $ filter (\(a,b) -> (a <= 1920) && (b <= 1080)) [(a*n,b*n)| (a,b) <- [(4,3)], n <- [1..1000]]"
Output:
[(1440,1080)]

 

Try disabling smooth filter?

 

Someone just mathed hard for your convenience OP, PRAISE HIM. PRAISE THE SHIT OUT OF HIM.

 

Turn off smooth shaders, that fixed ti fro me.

 

Smooth shaders OFF make it looks even uglier, BOEA's answer was correct, although it still only takes like 60% of my screen, :C oh goddamnit paid 200$ for a nice screen and now i cant play kag on fullscreen D:
if someone knows how to change that 'aspect ratio' he said, please reply here :)
look how it is on 1440x1080
http://pokit.org/get/?9409b53c1319c4a88f0cc54b0e2674cf.jpg

 

It looks really ugly, though.

This looks better, though.
also, ite is:
ite (a,b) n = (a*n,b*n)

Hm, so KAG Beta really does scale the window... The next question is, "What is your aspect ratio?"
For that, use google.

 

Looks normal to me...

 

The issue is that OP wants to have the whole screen covered by the window, without causing any nasty graphical scaling.
As far as we know, KAG Beta only likes being stretched to fit, instead of finding a best fit.

 

Looking at the vertex shader code for the file called "hq2x.vert" (this is for the smooth shading effect), without trying to fully understand it, it appears to be hardcoded for 1024x768 resolution.

Code:

float x = 1.0*scale/1024.0;
float y = 1.0*scale/768.0;

I too am using a 1920x1080 screen and was having weird pixel arifacts when using the smooth shader.
By changing the hardcoded resolution values in the shader to the following fixed it for me:

Code:

float x = 1.0*scale/1920.0;
float y = 1.0*scale/1080.0;

I assume the devs just forgot to add this as variable so it can be updated to fit the current resolution before drawing it on the screen. If this is some engine limitation, then i suggest generating the entire shader file each time a user changes resolution settings.

Edit: A few things i forgot to add:
This thread should probably be moved to the bugs section, if I am not mistaken about the shader code.

I am running the game in fullscreen.

Personally prefer smooth shading off regardless, gotta love dem pixels.

 

holy mother of god Zerd, thank you very much, it fixed the problem, using 1920x1080 now

For the ones having same problem, the hq2x.vert is in King Arthur's Gold\Base\Shaders

Zerds fix should be added to a sticky thread with common fixes, if fixed for both of us must fix for everyone, although would be better to the game actually change it automatic depending of your resolution

 

I knew it, but I didn't understand why you said it looks worse with the smooth filter disabled, so I thought it was a render failure.
Yeah, the size variable should be shared with the C++ code

 

Aparently it get broken everytime the game updates, the game should let it be diferent, just like another configurations....

 

Couldn't you use that? I'm not sure at all if you can use this though.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3226578/passing-a-variable-to-an-opengl-glsl-shader