MLK s3 Discussion

I wish i could like this, this gave me a good laugh.

 

I'm not sure why Competitve KAG has likes disabled tbh... @Galen

 

To avoid like-farming. It inherits this setting from the Clans forum which has likes disabled for the reason I just mentioned.

 

Oh my boi you are a genius <3 XD

 

I wish i could like this, this gave me a good laugh.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 9, 2016, Original Post Date: Nov 9, 2016 ---

thnx

 

Midway for EU vs US is Aus. US vs Aus is EU. EU vs Aus is US. Or just create a midway server (somewhere in Asia etc

 

I get 400 ping to AUS servers and most US players get about 200. And even if we both got ~300 to a server, I'd much rather play 133 vs 33 than 300 vs 300.

 

seems like Bo3 and 120 second build time are staying. I feel like we are almost ready to start the tournament.

We still need servers in Australia, North America and Possibly US west coast. If anybody wants to offer there server for this then tell me.

As for prizes I was talking with @Snake19 a while back about possible prizes for MLK s3 and he told me the title of being the winner could be good enough for a clan as its very hard to reward an entire clan and to have it all be fair.

Also we would like to have commentators again and live stream the clan wars. If anybody feels the can help in this department you can also tell me.

 

We need a list of teams participating.
Maybe @makmoud98 can host the server for USA again?
Bo3 is totally fine, not that the ticks or any part of last years rules were confusing, but for the sake of keeping it simple 3 matches should work. I like what @Stevedog had to say, instead of the faster match determining the winner, it determines which team has a slight advantage is all.
120 seconds is fine.
We need a list of teams participating.

I want to suggest that all challenges between clans during the freeplay period as well as all organization of each clan war be discussed in one public thread. The point of this would be to eliminate drama and all the he said she said bullshit. It would also do wonders in keeping who is active/inactive, and who will not accept challenges very transparent. I do understand that this could be one pretty messy thread though, without proper moderation and absolutely no shit posting allowed. Just an idea. Perhaps not even for challenging eachother, but after 2 clans discuss a time for a CW they be required to post about it before the actual match occurs, so EVERYONE knows they were supposed to have a match.

I also automatically agree with anything and everything @Psiklaw says.

 

jusr to point out, time when flag got capped depends on the map, so as long as both match1 and match2 are not played on same map one of teams is in worse situation

 

Can you make a point on what has change in the rules until now?

 

That's clever. Like-farming is such a big issue.

 

Game rules
- Build time is changed to 120 seconds
- Best Out of 3 matches
- 40 minute timer
- no ticks past mid


thats basically all that has changed considering game rules since last MLK.

 

I still don't know where the 3rd match of an EU vs US clan wars will be played ... and what about US vs AUS ? :/

Excepting if the match challenge the worst team of kag against the best, i NEVER saw a team with 133-200 ping won against a team with 33, it's totally unplayable and perfectly unfair x) and which team will play on the server of their continent ? the team who won ? the first match ? and if a team won one match and the other team win the 2nd ? who will play on the server of their continent ?

 

[AG#] - SURGE = 2-0 [AG#] LOSE (MLK 2) ( took this on the old AG page ) so it was one on the us serv and one on the eu one right?
--> 133-200 has already won against a team with 33 without being the worse against the best ;)

 

Oi, SURGE had both EU and US members.
After that match Snake tried to recruit for an US team.
Nice try.

 

i don't remember that match very well so had to try ;)

 

I don't think AG# has lost fair and square once, but let it be.