[denied] eragon200012 (EhRaGoN)

.
I think you still are one, you have some really serious personal problems with Eragon.

 

Can I just state one thing and ask another question to @Graver :
So you left for 350 days, came back, then left again for another 350 days, all in the time period of about 1 year, according to you post on the New/leaving/back thread.

And now to the question, why would you bother to stay on the forums for nearly a year, on a game that you left.

 

I was according to my signature.

Because reasons.

 

+1 i hope you get to be admin, u are a regular player and a friendly one.

 

+1
Stops to say 'hi'

 

Did you honestly come to the conclusion he's immature from this? Despite the huge amount of fabricated bullshit Graver had no proof for, the constant personal attacks, and digging through his messages on the forum (which lead to him finding nothing except a typo and him believing in some random site? really? do you honestly believe that's proof against fucking anything?), Eragon remained calm and defended himself throughout. He never resorted to any personal attacks. No name calling, no random bullshit that doesn't prove anything. He was simply trying to reveal how Graver was lying, and even offered to stop the argument when it got into flaming terrritory and take it somewhere else. This is exactly what I want in an admin, and if anything for me this would seal the deal, not break it.

EDIT: Interestingly enough, almost every single -1 he's been given has no explanation (except graver's absurd shit). If nobody can really bring up proof or even a fucking substantial reason for giving him a -1, I think that shows something, no?

 

1 and 4 - He copied my 2 years old messages and pasted them here (Of course he took only the "bad things" from them, he copied 1/4 of my post)
2- It was not about the typo- can you read my full post instead of the beginning?
3- He didn't.

 

So you decide that since he had a typo he's going to abuse admin? And you feel like this is sensible in any fucking way? Yeah, no.

He brought up things that show you're a troll and a bad player. You brought up irrelevant shit that means nothing to him being an admin. There's a difference.

Please show me at any point where he started getting angry? Did he ever insult you needlessly, bring up irrelevant trash, anything? No.
You've brought up claims about him being a "retarded 9 year old kid", so the burden of proof is on you - yet you have none. Honestly, just stop your bullshit.

 

+1 You are a good friend, and I think that you gonna be a good Admin.

 

Please read my post.

 

Is it really that difficult to keep it on topic of eragon's application? Really, if you guys have some kinda personal vendetta or so then take it to PM, instead of brawling it out in public.

 

It's hard when fan-boys are trying to argue with everyone that gave eragon -1.

 

+1, have known him back in the classic days. He is a nice person and has become more mature through the years. Although you need to play more cause I don't see you a lot when I am on. Also, at the same time, needs to be strict when needed (@101i is right, a guard dog is useless without teeth)

 

Eregon is a good guy, he is friendly and I haven't seen him do anything wrong, but I haven't really seen him do much as an admin either. I would -1 him because I think he would not know what to do in many situations, but I haven't seen him for too long to give a fair judgement. I looked back in the thread to make a better judgement and see what people had to say... and it seems like eregon still is a bit immature. Even if graver may act like a hothead too much that doesn't mean he is wrong (see http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fallacy_fallacy). The whole alpha penguin thing was a red flag for me, that is a pretty immature thing to do, and it doesn't seem like you actually +1ed him because you actually like him or something, as alpha penguin said himself "I've never seen you before".

This kind of reply is something someone without an argument would give, and so what if he's "abusing you" does it offend you that he asked "who the hell do you think you are?" or that he pointed out the fact that you gave alpha a +1 so he would give you a +1? Also I don't want an admin who would be so sensitive as to call an internet insult "abuse", here is the actual definition of abuse, "treat (a person or an animal) with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly." and is what he said really "abuse"?
You are really coming off as a tumblr feminist with that abuse excuse trying to act like the victim in an argument, but I don't blame you actually cause it seem a lot of the people who play kag would fall for that sorta thing super easily...
-1
inb4 Yaggers gonna call me salty.

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 24, 2015, Original Post Date: Aug 24, 2015 ---

"Yo mah, dey jus haters, u jus gotta gnore dem, nahm sayin?" wow I had no idea you were so fluent in dindu.

 

It's based on opinions, I can't make or change EhRa's opinion, nor can he change mine. I didn't think I saw much of him, turns out I was wrong. He's on most of the time when I join the server. That's why I changed my vote. And can you please link where I said I have never seen EhRa before, because I don't recall posting it.

 

Despite all the controversy on this subject, I still believe that Eragon is a decent guy, and will step up to the task.
+1

 

So ? Do you have proofs ?