Rejected "glyphs" by FG

Map name: FG_glyphs

Spoiler

Spoiler

Thread:https://forum.thd.vg/threads/fg_╜φ°⌂▌╫§╜φ°⌂.28398/

 

Reallllly simple map, the thought was put into the name/png aesthetic instead of gameplay. I say no

 

I like the resources and the bedrock, but the mid is really simple. The lower part could be blocked in/defended totally with the bedrock pillars + backwall above, making it really hard to push, so it leaves only the upper part that is almost flat. Theres gold on the side wall but I think its impossible to break that, its in the 2 blocks that the map dont let you dig absolutely nothing on it. The first flag being higher could be a real pain to capture for one team due to the elevation. The tent area is a good catapult spot and you can maybe reach the other team tent with a chicken. Its an ok map with a really simple mid imo, so its a no but I still think it could be a ok map to be accepted.

 

No bedrock at top mid, spawn height make easy to manage and infinitely protect tower including flags. I agree with first flag height problem. No and map is rejected.