Rejected "DownInAHole" by Didgedy

Cute little islands and superfluous amount of trees, ask for better resource spread and flags above tent will lead to stalemate. Low sky and mid ground will lead to rat haven, what else it will be really hard to capture flags. I will say no.

 

I actually like the idea of this map, but there are definitely some issues.I agree that mid will become a rat fest, and the bedrock placement wouldn't be ideal if the map deteriorates. This can be fixed with better/raised bedrock in each case though. In regards to the flags, yes they are close to spawn but you have to take into account the power of being above the enemy's tower if you take mid. Kegs and catas are so much more effective and are much easier to pull off when above the target. My main concern would be a player pipe that leads straight up to flag, which could be solved by adding more bedrock on either side of flag. Theres also the issue of potentially getting locked in spawn, although thats less likely on this map than the other one. They seem to use trees as a decoration rather than a resource, which is problematic. Theres too much gold and arguably too much stone. I think it could work with some changes, namely fix bedrock and resource distribution (gold, stone, trees).

 

Too much trees and stone, maybe too much gold.
Big rat heaven on mid.
The height advantage for the team that captures mid will probably end the match in no time with siege and kegs, so it will be hard to the other team to defend.
I think the tent is weird below the flag, but could be just me.
I will say no without fixes for bedrock and maybe resources.