Diablo III

Diablo 3 sentiment's after release:
Error37 - Hah, everywhere. Hilarious since so many just wanted to play it singleplayer
Ending cinematic - Yuck.
Story - Bland
'Secret Cow Level' - Now full of ponies, disgusting, do not want

But the one thing they did right:
Succubi have nipples.
</br>--- merged: May 17, 2012 12:25 AM ---</br>
Daily reminder that you bought this piece of shit:


Good job pre-ordering.

 

Spoiler

I'm simply posting information to backup points made previously about how it was obvious this game would suck from a mile away months ago.

I post because this game is politically motivated and buying it will further ruin games, especially online ones as companies believe that it is okay to start 'RMAH' to combat 'RMT' (as if it ever fucking needed it) and then charge absurd tax rates (30%+) to get money.

What you people are doing by buying it is the same as feeding MapleStory's initial market which led to every game having microtransactions.

9.8? IGN was paid off. And I'm not pulling that out of my ass either, all the big game reviewers get paid off, if you are still taking anything that any of them (especially IGN) put out as an actual fact you are insane. 9 was fucking average for last year and 10 was pretty standard too, there isn't a AAA title that doesn't get a 9-10 now.

You are also implying that I played the game outside of beta, but I already know what your counter argument will be, the same one that every WoWfag ever also tries "If you didn't play it than you don't really know if it's bad or not", "The beta doesn't count you have to play the whole thing".

There are many reasons to like a game, usually gameplay is one of them, and the gameplay of D3 isn't terrible, it's not much better than D2 which objectively is decent, but was realistically a clickfest, it's made up for by many other subtleties. D3 is pretty similar in many respects. There are however many reasons to not like a game, and there are many reasons to not buy a game:
1)The game has bad gameplay
2)The game is politically motivated to fuck you in the ass either now or down the line- generally this means testing out what they can get away with. "How many CoD can we rehash and resell to you?" "Can we get away with using DRM?" "Can we put DRM on their PC like Origin and get away with it?" "What if we put a rootkit on their PC to combat hacking?"
3)Sequels made for no reason other than to cash out - abuse a waiting fanbase

D3 has a problem on both 2 and 3, and to some people 1. Can it be fun? Sure , if you're really into ARPGs, but if you really played D2, the people who really played it, pvp, trading, staying around all that time really playing it, they're not going to enjoy it. Trading is fucked because of RMAH mostly, roundabout trading will have to be done, they were probably be mostly done by that single d2 community that has lasted so long and permeates into many other games, pvp is not even in and from what they talked about will be immensely shallow when it comes out, items not even having pvp specs so pvp will end up stupidly unbalanced (once again). The story was a fucking terrible ending (this angel bullshit was terrible, diablo looked like a weak ass female instead of a badass), they used crude popculture references that only retards already shill into (pony shit) that everyone will look back including those stupid enough to get caught up in it in 10 years and cringe. D3 won't have the staying power that D2 had, and D2 mostly had it because of the decent story, replayability, and it being mostly the only thing like it. With all the contenders D3 has, that won't happen this time around, they chose the wrong business model, and they made the wrong game.

TL;DR - Just posting things that prove my point, if you're going to be mad because you like what is a bad game that will only fuck the video game industry later, have fun, but I'll also go ahead and post about how it's bad so more idiots don't buy it.

Last thing I need is next year's MMO to go all RMAH 50% tax + microtransactions

 

Clicking does not good gameplay make.
The storyline sucks, that is not my opinion, it is a bad ending to a storyline. It is about as bad of an ending as ME3s.
RMAH, we'll see, but of course you'll 'hurr i like it'.

My recent posts had nothing to do with opinion.

The story was classic angels and demons, a shitty ending to diablo which had a 'decent' story and memorable moments..
The popculture cash in for people like you who jump onto ponies and shit was stupid as hell as well, again arguing with someone who already is silly enough to like ponies about how they ruined diablo is like telling someone who enjoys eating shit that eating shit is bad, they never care what you have to say because 'Well I liek it', or 'but you don't understand', or whatever other silly reason.

I mean unless you really want to give me one good reason that they would add that ponyshit level, please go ahead.

 

Cows weren't really a huge pop culture reference that the internet is mostly divided on.

I think everyone wanted a cow level, but they wanted something fun and different but also actually blizzard's, not something completely unrelated that is already it's own thing. That's where the actual problem comes in with that.

 

See previous statement of exactly what you would say "Waaah you have to play a game to know it's good"
"There's nothing wrong with ponies in diablo!"
Please provide a reason, I've already provided mine.

 

You can't read the inside jacket of a book or it's first two chapters and see how good or bad it will be?
I didn't have to read Twilight to know it was teenage drivel. I didn't have to read George Bush's several books to know that they were shit.

It's something people always go to because they think it will stop an argument and it avoids them actually having to make an argument, it is no different from him saying 'go away, stop saying bad things about the game I liek waaah' as he did a few posts prior.