[PETITION TO REMOVE WATER AMMO]

[I'm half tempted to call EJ, BJ]

Anyways, water ammo isn't rare, if you want rare, look for mounted bows [no shops built], and bomb ammo [really small item cap/ production speed].

 

what i am saying about rare, is that they se it rarely

--- Double Post Merged, Sep 9, 2013 ---

and i have never seen anyone do that

 

I see this happening once every couple of game when I play on large servers.
Not trying to be rude, but how often you do you play george?

 

Water ammo could be nerfed a bit, but removing it altogether seems drastic.

 

We have water buckets, and even two buckets is enough to keep all fires in check. [1 Bucket has 3 Uses per Fill]
Water ammo makes dousing too available, and makes fire a non-issue, and pointless when water ammo is researched.

It'd give reason more reason for people to actually care about features like the workbench, hall care, and fire.
[ Remember, Fire is a Large Feature in the Game, and it makes little sense for it to be Plain Useless ]

 

ALOT, and you are not rude, its alright if you are rude

 

The problem is that the long range stun barely benefits anyone.

Otherwise, knights have to use water bombs from a distance that they can't use the stun, or they are stunned too. And knights can trigger the bombs they throw when doing a "momentum throw".

 

Not specifically signing for removal, but rather for nerfing. IMO, If they removed the ability for water ammo to douse fire, reduced the stun to 1 sec, and gave you the ability to put them in mounted bows, it would be good. It would also fix the issue with no one using mounted bows even though they are really strong when used properly. But if they don't nerf them, I sign for removal.

Spoiler: Off-topic

Maybe also add fire and bomb ammo to mounted bow

 

But, what's the point of water ammo when the already too short stun length is further decreased?
I agree that water ammo makes dousing too available/easy, but it doesn't make sense to remove it from "water" ammo, other than change the name I suppose.

 

Possibly make it flash ammo, increase the stun to 3 secs, decrease the self-stun radius, add it to MB, and then it would be good?

 

No.

oh god no.

Why.

You don't even understand why we hate this. First off, it's an effortless fix for fire, one of the best parts of the game. Second, it already stuns for far too long. Making an even larger stun is absurd. Third, so far I have yet to see someone wanting to keep it, who doesn't use it to stunlock.

 

I agree with this guy. Yes, I know I signed for removal.. but I also sign that this should be done. Not every single player is in their hall when its burning.. most are outside. Best to just.. make it this way.

 

Seems everyone forgot that buckets have a large dousing range, and three uses per fill, and splashes when it falls a considerable distance, or hits something hard.

Having water ammo still out modes fire completely because of how fast it produces, and because it is a spawn item; again, two buckets can still easily keep any fire in check, without water ammo.

 

I actually use water ammo in combat. It knocks archers off grappling hooks, stuns knights before they can throw bombs, and often bumps builders off the top of pencil towers.

 

This is true. But can you hit a burning fire from like... 50 blocks away by throwing a bucket... not really xD

 

Do you really need the option to douse fires from 50 tiles away, do you forget, there are builders, or workbenches near the halls.

Water ammo loses much of its novelty when it can't stun, and water ammo destroys the utility of a larger feature of the game, fire, because anyone can douse fires from 50 tiles away, with their dirt-common water arrows.

 

Won't hurt, but hey, I guess you're right. :o