Comments on Profile Post by PUNK123

[21:34:43] --- Vote failed: 6 vs 5 (out of 18 ---
[21:34:43] Panky (PUNK123) needs to take a spoonful of cement! Play on!
[21:34:50] <Cuffs> lol
[21:34:52] <Lame Panky> fuck
[21:34:52] <Cuffs> 6v5 loses
[21:34:54] <Lame Panky> geti
[21:34:55] <Lame Panky> fuck
[21:35:00] <SURGE Teddy> ight
[21:35:00] <Lame Panky> fuck geti
[21:35:00] <Lame Panky> fuck geti
[21:35:01] <Lame Panky> fuck geti

[22:02:46] --- A vote was started by PUNK123 ---
[22:02:56] <5maps pUnk> it is cancer
[22:03:09] <5maps pUnk> red is just ballista bold spammignt eh fucking ocean
[22:03:16] --- Vote failed: 6 vs 5 (out of 19 ---
[22:03:16] pUnk (PUNK123) needs to take a spoonful of cement! Play on!
[22:03:21] <5maps pUnk> fuck u geti
[22:03:35] <5maps pUnk> i hope you choke on mm's hairy polish sausage

[22:10:28] --- A vote was started by WallSlasher ---
[22:10:29] <ETID|Cuffs> this map is after that one
[22:10:34] <ETID|Cuffs> VOTE
[22:10:36] <ETID|Cuffs> SKIP
[22:10:39] <5maps pUnk> IF THIS DOESNT PASS
[22:10:51] <ETID|Cuffs> PRESS O
[22:10:58] --- Vote failed: 8 vs 6 (out of 18 ---
[22:11:01] <5maps pUnk> ffs
[22:11:06] <ETID|Cuffs> fuck my life right up
[22:11:07] <5maps pUnk> literally kys geti

8 is not a majority out of 18

You wanted them to be harder to pass :^) I already mentioned non-participation as an issue.

Seriously though @norill is going to(/has?) opened a discussion about this and potential solutions. I look forward to finding a solution that suits everyone, not sure that one exists though.

Um, i was never in favor of these votes going over all different votes(only surrenders) so uh yea i still blame you.

>i still blame you
what else is new? :)

Vote skip and surrender are more or less equivalent, there's just fewer players able to vote for a surrender. Vote kick is liable for "i dont like this guy, buddies remove him" votes if 2v0 passes (due to nonparticipation).

My point here is you can make a case for whatever system - in the end its all democracy of angry internet folk and therefore definitely no substitute for good moderation.

I'm happy to revert though, but keep in mind in any system there's going to be mass nonparticipation on the no-vote side -> heavy bias towards passing for those that _do_ vote

:^^^)