Accepted "Explorersground" by Cleaf

Map name: Explorersground

Spoiler

thread: https://forum.thd.vg/threads/cleaf_explorersground.28405/

--- Double Post Merged, Jan 23, 2020, Original Post Date: Jan 22, 2020 ---

Third-rate resource spread and gold position is grotty. About bedrock is one word and it is horrendous, you can easly flood all map and it's unfun. Last thing, this map in concept is similar to mazey_epic. @Cleaf it's just suggestions, make stone in large chunks not scattered like this and keep gold closer to ground.

 

Stone still needs better resource spread, dirt deterioration is problematic, mid can easly turn into water pit. No.

 

I do agree it's a bit similar to epic, but with the dirt back wall it's easy enough to bridge across the water because it doesn't look like you can flood the upper water. I think the biggest issue is how close the back flag is to the tent, I would likely want this to be a one flag that isn't too strong simply because of the risk of a water pit map. Yes from me tho

 

Resource could be better spread out, but still ok for me. Should be easy to bridge above water as waffle pointed out. Its kinda similar to epic but I dont think they would play the same. Back flag could be more on the front and maybe add more bedrock to prevent deterioration would be nice.

 

Someone will ask cleaf for changes?

--- Double Post Merged, May 13, 2020, Original Post Date: Apr 12, 2020 ---

updated by creator

 

It's still so similar to epic lol, although with less of the glaring issues that epic had. I would suggest adding some dirt backwall over the mid pit, but that's just personal preference.

 

Glaring issue: flag is in redzone during build time. On hold until fixed.

--- Double Post Merged, Jul 17, 2020, Original Post Date: Jul 6, 2020 ---

updated.

 

I feel like this is what Fuzzle_Stale was trying to be but failed horribly at because of the underground flag.

 

So what with this one? I'm still closer to no than yes.

 

I think it's a good map that'd work fine in official. I don't think it brings anything particularly interesting to the table, but if stale isn't in the map pool I think it'd be fine to add this one. The map is likely to be played pretty aggressively and quickly, and even if the map does deteriorate there's plenty of dirt backwall to build right up to flag. Why are you closer to no Ferre?

 

It's litte matter, accepted.