Is the game really realistic? Facts vs Gameplay

Actually i would really like to see blimps in KAG, but i can't see any point of submarines.

 

Personally I think airships and whatnot would be a bit too steampunk-y to fit the game's theme. Maybe modders could add that in themselves if they wanted to.

Battles on the high seas would be pretty bitchin' though.

 

Dragons, underwater serpents , Cannontoads.

But we can't be sure! How are we to know that the players are not multi skilled steam punk robots?

 

IDEA. Cannons. Ships. That Is All.

 

Airships would be the skybridge to end all skybridges.

 

That One arrow In The Air-Pack Thing Would Make It Fall, Killing The People Inside.
FAILGREIF

 

This thread's hardly run its' original course-discussing realistic merit of things-- to be drifting off to another-how beneficial to gameplay these unrealistic things would be--; back on topic, please.

 

Realism only belongs in games that strive for realism. Bombs in medieval times? I could see it happening. Why couldn't they just stumble across some way to create an explosive element?

I remember someone bitching about how they wanted the fly glitch to stay in. Bombjumping is one thing, at least there are some physics behind it and in the goofy, Monty Pythonesque style of the game; while two knights flying is hilarious, I just don't see how two knights holding their shields towards the air magically cements them on a horizontal axis, allowing them to freely move left and right.

Frankly, this game is about as good as it gets when it comes to massively multiplayer games. Two teams of upwards of 48 people (24 on 24), fun, fast-paced, humorous with the reactions and Wilhelm screams, plus the competitive nature... It isn't the type of game where you can go to a website, drop $10 and suddenly have 10 million gold in your game. You can't BUY skill, which makes it have a level playing field. Anyone can become skilled at this game, it just takes a ton of practice, strategizing, and teamwork.

I have no problem with things being unrealistic in this game; but it at least has to make SENSE. Hence why I enjoy bombjumping, but thought planing was such a stupid glitch.

 

You guys are all silly, obviously realism is what makes games timeless masterpieces.
Just look at the greats: Mario, Sonic, Kirby, etc.

Did any of these games let you fly on airships or have bombs or robots?
The facts speak for themselves.

 

It's a damn game, who cares? Unless you plan on hiding in caves and bashing people's skulls in with hammers realism shouldn't matter.

 

I don't know, if the game is realistic. Maybe the world is not made in 2d pixel art. Maybe in early Medieval Age, there were no bombs. Aaaargh ! I hate bomb ! Maybe in real world, you can't destroy a cata with 3 arrows. Maybe there is a lot of thing, including physics and mecanic, that is not really realistic in Kag, but who cares?
Kag is just a damn good game.

 

What great, popular game is realistic? Not even COD is realistic in my opinion.
With the removal of squeezing, I don't see why people are complaining about it not being real.

Plus, real life is boring. Who wants to play a game and be reminded of how boring real life is?

 

Why would you dislike stuff that doesn't make sense?
Minecraft doesn't make sense, but you can create questions of it.
You can make answers out of that

 

I think if there is valuable gameplay involved, add it. A note to the DEVS - Make this game into what you envision it to be, while adding on things suggested by the fan base IF you believe it to be valuable.

 

What do you mean by valuable?

 

I would assume he means valuable to the game itself; IE. something that is fun and makes the game more enjoyable or more balanced.

 

Defined by the developers, but pretty much, if adding it makes the game more/less fun.

If this was a hardcore realistic game, then valuable could be defined as the realism of a feature.

 

As long as it sticks to the medieval theme, i am fine with it.

 

No perks, just visual perks like capes and such.