Spoiler Sincerely, you sir, joke me here. Not only do you cut off whole sentence to make it seem that I am wrong, do you think that because you may have certain 'high status' here, makes you superior to me? I don't think so. I will take you on and destroy any arrogance that you hold if you dare think that you can get away with things just because you are more 'closer' to the people of the forums. Righteousness and justice does not always win. However, here is not the case as I have pointed it out. Let's take this outside. Each 'quote' you made of mine is redundant. I will explain. I did not mention nor hint at the word or meaning of 'steal' at any time in my comment. Ask him, if he did or did not see me use this trap and comment on it in-game before he designed this trap. The reason I am annoyed at him not mentioning me, is because I had technically 'revived'/'rediscovered' this trap. It is truthful and absolutely legitimate that I had experimented approximately 3 hours on a weekend and stumbled upon this trap while I experimented with best ways to cross a spike pit. Therefore, point number 4 pointed out that I had technically rediscovered this, even though this was posted on the threads before I had 'discovered' this. If you look at the whole sentence: my statement clearly means I had 'found out' by myself about it before I had read about the thread. Ghozt has therefore taken it 'to use' if you may, just to be more specific for you. I'm sorry that some people can't read and understand. And that last bit in bold? Do I need to even explain it to you? It is obvious that you have already lost this argument. Please step down from this argument before you embarrass yourself. Remember: it is not just your view of a situation. It is the publicity's. Sincerely and respectfully, Soul. With formal apologies and reminders to all that: Spoiler (pretend 'Z' is an object) Person A created Z. All Persons ignored Z and never noticed it. Person B found pie, then researched on Z and found Person A had initially created Z. Person B revived Z and put it in use, even though he/she was the only one. Person C sees Z used by Person B. Person C uses Z without mention of Person B. Person C gets credit. Person B is neglected and B's rediscovery is ignored.